Lords vote to save hunting

The House of Lords has rejected the proposed ban on hunting by an overwhelming 317 to 68.

Peers voted three times on the legislation: once after taking out the clauses which ban hunting, again after inserting an amendment proposing a system of self-regulation (249 for the Bill to 108 against), and, finally, after these latter amendments had been replaced with strict licensing laws (122 for the Bill; 202 against).

In a heated four-hour debate, some peers condemned the decision to proceed with the bill at all while foot-and-mouth disease was raging through the countryside.

Members of the House were expected, by both hunt supporters and welfare groups, to vote against a total ban.

The fact that the so-called ‘Middle Way’ option was thrown out has delighted hunt supporters.

Simon Hart of the Countryside Alliance, a proponent of self-regulation, said: “This is overwhelming cross-party objection to a ban and it is quite clear there is no mandate for criminalising people who support hunting.”

Stay in touch with all the news in the run-up to and throughout the major shows and events during 2026 and beyond with a Horse & Hound subscription. Subscribe today for all you need to know ahead of these major events, plus online reports on the action as it happens from our expert team of reporters and in-depth analysis in our special commemorative magazines. Have a subscription already? Set up your unlimited website access now