Horses for Sale

NAF

Height

Price

More horses for sale

Sell your horse from only £15

Sell your Horse Sell your Trailer Sell your Property

Subscriptions

Horse and Hound Cover

Search the Site

Quick Search: Type a keyword into the box below to search our site

Question of the Week

Should horses be remeasured mid-season?

Discuss in the forum

Click to view past results


You are here: Home / Articles / News

Report claims no scientific grounds for hunting ban

Tessa Waugh, H&H freelance writer

18 August, 2007

Check out the latest H&H subscription offers >>

The ban on hunting with dogs has no scientific grounds, according to a recent report from the All Party Parliamentary Middle Way Group and the Veterinary Association for Wildlife Management (VAWM).

The Use, Misuse and Abuse of Science, released on 27 July, claims that the government, media and public were "duped by fake and twisted science" provided by anti-hunting groups in the run up to the ban in February 2005.

According to the report, "the large body of scientific evidence" cited by the RSPCA simply does not exist.

The government-commissioned Burns Report, published in June 2000, comes under scrutiny for seeking to justify the ban on grounds of cruelty, although in a 2004 speech in the Lords, its author Lord Burns admitted "there is insufficient verifiable evidence to reach views about cruelty".

This report further discredits the Burns Report because it does not allow for the animal escaping with a fatal wound.

The report also claims some items of research such as A Veterinary Opinion on Hunting with Hounds by Thomas and Allen were ignored. This document represented 300 vets and concluded that hunting constituted the most humane method of control.

Dr Lewis Thomas of the VAWM said: "I understand this was ignored because it was based on opinion instead of fact. But why, when they were listening to the opinion of anti-hunting professors?"

The new report also points out that the only peer-reviewed scientific study into wounding in shot foxes (published in the Universities Federation for Animal Welfare in its journal Animal Welfare, in May 2005) was largely ignored by MPs.

Dr Thomas said he hoped the report would allow politicians motivated to repeal the ban "to have sound information to support their cause".

This news story was first published in Horse & Hound (16 August, '07)

Related articles:


Printer friendly version  

e-Newsletter

Enter your email address below to sign up for equestrian news, horses for sale and special offers.
View the newsletter




Subscribe to Horse & Hound and Save

Horse & Hound Cover

Enjoy all the latest equestrian news and competition reports delivered straight to your door every week.

Click here to subscribe now